Association between the number of altered late potential criteria and increased arrhythmic risk in Brugada syndrome patients.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is associated with abnormal electrophysiological properties at right ventricular epicardium, consisting of fragmented electrograms extending well beyond QRS termination. We aimed to evaluate the utility of signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SA-ECG) for the noninvasive assessment of late potentials (LP) and risk stratification of BrS patients. METHODS: A prospective, observational, single-center study of BrS patients is submitted to SA-ECG with the determination of the total filtered QRS duration (fQRS), root mean square voltage of the 40 ms terminal portion of the QRS (RMS40), and duration of the low-amplitude electric potential component of the terminal portion of the QRS (LAS40). LP were considered positive when above standard cut-offs: fQRS > 114 ms, RMS40 < 20 µV, and LAS40 > 38 ms. The rates of malignant arrhythmic events (MAEs), defined as sudden death or appropriate shocks, were compared in relation to clinical characteristics and SA-ECG findings. RESULTS: A total of 106 BrS patients (mean age, 48 ± 12 years, 67.9% male) were studied, 49% with type-1 spontaneous pattern and 81% asymptomatic. During a median follow up of 4.7 years, 10 patients (7.1%) suffered MAEs, including 4 sudden deaths. The presence of LP was significantly associated with the arrhythmic risk, which increased with the number of altered LP criteria. In comparison to the patients who had none or 1 altered LP criterium, MAE risk was 4.7 times higher in those with 2 altered criteria and 9.4 times higher in those with 3 altered LP criteria. CONCLUSIONS: SA-ECG may be a useful tool for risk stratification in BrS. The presence of 2 or 3 abnormal LP criteria could identify a subset of asymptomatic patients at high risk of arrhythmic events.

Telehealth Opportunities in the COVID-19 Pandemic Early Days: What Happened, Did Not Happen, Should Have Happened, and Must Happen in the Near Future?

The objective of this communication is to offer a better understanding of the value of telemedicine in health care, particularly its role in creating opportunities for continuity of care to patients in a complex and novel setting as were the circumstances of the early COVID-19 pandemic times. Crisis time is also a time for opportunities. With regard to telehealth, all players (providers, staff, and patients) should be informed about its benefits and should also become familiar with the use of the various telehealth options and this will only be achieved through large information campaigns necessary enriched by local teaching and training programs in both public and private institutions. The final aim is to launch the debate and foster ideas useful throughout the pandemic. This article covers the experiences of physicians as well as health professionals in the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal), to provide a clearer idea of what has happened and how we can improve it with the possibilities provided by telemedicine, while at the same time to put in evidence that public health systems need to be rethought to provide solutions to situations such as that we are experiencing.